What matters about this combination of criteria: Budget plans suit small projects with no overpaying. US data centres suit American audiences and Forex on NYSE/NASDAQ. cPanel simplifies managing sites, databases and email with no command line.

Bottom line: for most projects in Ukraine the ideal VPS means NVMe storage, a 99.9%+ SLA, a convenient panel and support in your language. Start with the ranking leaders above and compare them side by side.

Tophosting editorial · independent analysis since 2014

How we test

1We measure performance across plans
2We check support response times
3We read real reviews, not “we love everything”
4We analyse refund policies
5We update the ranking monthly

Which VPS suits whom

For a blog or portfolio

Cheap plans, simple launch

For small business

Stability and 24/7 support

For an online store

Speed, scalability, backups

For developers

SSH access, root, flexible config

Frequently asked questions

A Windows Server with .NET installed (Framework or Core), the IIS web server and usually an MS SQL database. Linux hosting isn't suitable for classic ASP.NET (though .NET Core runs on Linux too).

.NET Core / .NET 5+ — yes, it's cross-platform. But classic ASP.NET (Framework) needs Windows only. If your app uses the old Framework, choose a Windows VPS.

A low price isn't always bad. For a blog or landing page, a budget server (1–2 GB RAM, NVMe) is plenty. The key is to check uptime and support availability, not just price.

Low cost comes from the location (cheaper data centre rent), denser client packing or the absence of managed services. That's fine for small projects, but verify the virtualization type.

When your audience is in America, you run a SaaS targeting the US market or Forex robots on NYSE/NASDAQ. A US server gives minimal latency for American users.

120–160 ms depending on location (East Coast is closer). It's imperceptible for regular sites but noticeable for real-time apps — for a UA audience, Europe is better.

User reviews

Dmytro

about TheHost·3 January 2025

Good

Отличный провайдер, служба поддержки заслуживает высшей оценки касательно предоставляемой помощи клиентам. Рекомендую.

Дмитрий

about BestHosting·4 June 2014

Good

Пользуюсь этим хостингом с 2009 года, и многие знакомые – по моей рекомендации – тоже. Нареканий ни у кого не возникало. Техподдержка доступна 24 часа, всегда поможет и даже разъяснит технические вопросы, не связанные с хостингом.

baa584

about UAhosting·28 January 2025

Good

Очень удобный хостинг, уже более 8 лет его использую и не бвло ни одной проблемв, так как очень хорошая поддержка. Цены одни из самых низких. Рекомендую.

Sergey

about BestHosting·25 November 2021

Good

Отличный хостинг за свои деньги. Пару раз приходилось по своей вине ночью с поддержкой общаться - без проблем. Помогли, разжевали. Спасибо вам.

Related categories

Not sure what to choose?

Compare top providers on key parameters in one click.