EN
Updated: June 2026

Shared hosting · Budget projects · Ukraine · DirectAdmin

An independent ranking of VPS/VDS providers — objective specs, prices and reviews in one place.

Hosts
46
Avg uptime
99.9%
Price from
$0
Reviews
2k
Providers found 1
🥇
S-Host
S-Host
Budget projectsSimple hosting for small business
4.0/5
Good 36 reviews
from
$2/mo
Test Drive7 d
Uptime99.8%
Entry1 vCPU · 1 GB
PanelDirectAdmin
OSLinux
Locations
Visit site

VPS plans

VPS-11 vCPU1 GB RAM20 GB NVMe∞ Bandwidth$2
VPS-22 vCPU2 GB RAM40 GB NVMe∞ Bandwidth$4
VPS-32 vCPU4 GB RAM60 GB NVMe∞ Bandwidth$7.5
About the category

Shared hosting budget in Ukraine with DirectAdmin

A curated selection: Shared hosting budget in Ukraine with DirectAdmin. We picked providers matching these criteria and sorted them by rating, uptime and real reviews.

What matters about this combination of criteria: Shared hosting is the most affordable option for simple sites. Budget plans suit small projects with no overpaying. Servers in Ukraine give minimal latency for a local audience. DirectAdmin is a lightweight, fast panel that saves server resources.

Bottom line: for most projects in Ukraine the ideal VPS means NVMe storage, 99.9%+ uptime, a convenient panel and support in your language. Start with the ranking leaders above and compare them side by side.

How we test

  • 1We measure performance across plans
  • 2We check support response times
  • 3We read real reviews, not “we love everything”
  • 4We analyse refund policies
  • 5We update the ranking monthly

Which VPS suits whom

For a blog or portfolio

Cheap plans, simple launch

For small business

Stability and 24/7 support

For an online store

Speed, scalability, backups

For developers

SSH access, root, flexible config

Frequently asked questions

It's the most affordable hosting type, where one server's resources are split among many sites. You get disk space and a control panel without needing to administer the server.
Simple sites: landing pages, blogs, business-card sites, small WordPress/OpenCart stores. For traffic up to 10–20K visitors/day it's perfectly sufficient.
A low price isn't always bad. For a blog or landing page, a budget server (1–2 GB RAM, NVMe) is plenty. The key is to check uptime and support availability, not just price.
Low cost comes from the location (cheaper data centre rent), denser client packing or the absence of managed services. That's fine for small projects, but verify the virtualization type.
A server in Ukraine gives minimal latency for a local audience (under 5 ms), payment in UAH, native-language support and compliance with in-country data storage requirements.
Yes, leading data centres (Kyiv, Kharkiv, Dnipro) have backup power, generators and multiple uplinks. Confirm generator availability — it guarantees uptime during outages.

User reviews

А
Алехандро
about GMhost·9 March 2018
Bad

Сутки пытался связаться с поддержкой. Операция не завершилась успехом. О чем дальше говорить? Не рекомендую.

b
baa584
about UAhosting·28 January 2025
Good

Очень удобный хостинг, уже более 8 лет его использую и не бвло ни одной проблемв, так как очень хорошая поддержка. Цены одни из самых низких. Рекомендую.

А
Алексей
about Mirohost·21 July 2017
Bad

Техподдержка вообще отстойная, жду ответа от 3 до 4 часов, решают проблему так же! Нету никаких онлайн мессенджеров для быстрой связи, есть телефон и тот стационарный через который не дозвонится никак... В ОБЩЕМ НЕ РЕКОМЕНДУЮ!!!!!!!!!

r
roror
about Fornex·11 October 2017
Good

Качественная и быстрая служба поддержки (правда в ночное время принимают только срочные заказы, смотрите в личном кабинете при создании тикета есть опция выбора) Сервера в основном новые, по крайней мере у меня.

Not sure what to choose?

Compare top providers on key parameters in one click.