Updated: October 10, 2026

Shared hosting · Budget projects

An independent ranking of VPS/VDS providers — objective specs, prices and reviews in one place.

Hosts
47
Server countries
26
Price from
$1.11
Reviews
2k
Providers found 23
Providers found 23

Key parameters compared

HostFromLocationsTrialScore
Fornex$467 days4.9
GMhost$1.4947 days4.4
Friendhosting$2.2211—4.8
HyperHost$1.6827 days4.5
TheHost$1.3047 days4.7
S-Host$1.9827 days4.0
Zomro$4.45330 days4.6
Ukraine.com.ua$6.8815 days4.3
Fozzy$14.9567 days4.8
UAhosting$1.11314 days4.2

Prices are monthly, per provider data as of the page update date.

About the category

Shared hosting budget

A curated selection: Shared hosting budget. We picked providers matching these criteria and sorted them by rating and real reviews.

What matters about this combination of criteria: Shared hosting is the most affordable option for simple sites. Budget plans suit small projects with no overpaying.

Bottom line: for most projects in Ukraine the ideal VPS means NVMe storage, a 99.9%+ SLA, a convenient panel and support in your language. Start with the ranking leaders above and compare them side by side.

How we test

  • 1We measure performance across plans
  • 2We check support response times
  • 3We read real reviews, not “we love everything”
  • 4We analyse refund policies
  • 5We update the ranking monthly

Which VPS suits whom

For a blog or portfolio

Cheap plans, simple launch

For small business

Stability and 24/7 support

For an online store

Speed, scalability, backups

For developers

SSH access, root, flexible config

Frequently asked questions

It's the most affordable hosting type, where one server's resources are split among many sites. You get disk space and a control panel without needing to administer the server.
Simple sites: landing pages, blogs, business-card sites, small WordPress/OpenCart stores. For traffic up to 10–20K visitors/day it's perfectly sufficient.
A low price isn't always bad. For a blog or landing page, a budget server (1–2 GB RAM, NVMe) is plenty. The key is to check uptime and support availability, not just price.
Low cost comes from the location (cheaper data centre rent), denser client packing or the absence of managed services. That's fine for small projects, but verify the virtualization type.

User reviews

О
Олег Гаевский
about SIM-Networks·5 January 2018
Good

Неплохой хостинг провайдер. Арендуем у них дедик. Сервер предоставили невероятно быстро, помогли запустить бесплатно. Доступ стабильный, качественный, работает слаженно.

Г
Георгий
about Zomro·27 May 2024
Good

Суперский хостинг.Пока что лучший из тех, которыми я пользовался.Очень быстро получаю ответ на интересующие вопросы

А
Алехандро
about HostLife·9 March 2018
Bad

Кастомизации сервера нет. Убогий порт на 25мбит Возможности ставить свою ОС нет Пробного периода нет. Наверное, худший хост из тех, что я видел. Не рекомендую.

В
Віталій
about HostIQ·29 May 2023
Good

Користуюся цим хостингм, нарікань поки немає, чуйна підтримка, допоможуть у твоїх питаннях, сайт працює стабільно швидко, поки негативного ставлення не наводилося мати, радує захист облікового запису!

Not sure what to choose?

Compare top providers on key parameters in one click.